Zeitschriftenaufsatz | 2023 Open Access

Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline (Retracted Article)

Autor:in
Holmqvist, Kenneth; Oerbom, Saga Lee; Hooge, Ignace T. C.; Niehorster, Diederick; Alexander, Robert; Andersson, Richard; Benjamins, Jeroen; Blignaut, Pieter J.; Brouwer, Anne-Marie; Chuang, Lewis; Dalrymple, Kirsten A.; Drieghe, Denis; Dunn, Matt; Ettinger, Ulrich; Fiedler, Susann; Foulsham, Tom; van der Geest, Jos N.; Hansen, Dan Witzner; Hutton, Samuel B.; Kasneci, Enkelejda; Kingstone, Alan; Knox, Paul; Kok, Ellen; Lee, Helena; Lee, Joy Yeonjoo; Leppanen, Jukka; Macknik, Stephen; Majaranta, Paivi; Martinez-Conde, S; Nuthmann, Antje; Nystrom, Marcus; Orquin, Jacob L.; Otero-Millan, Jorge; Park, S. Y.; Popelka, Stanislav; Proudlock, Frank A.; Renkewitz, Frank; Roorda, Austin; Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Michael; Sharif, Bonita; Shic, Frederick; Shovman, Mark M.; Thomas, Mervyn G.; Venrooij, Ward; Zemblys, Raimondas; Hessels, Roy S.
Schlagwörter
Eye movements; Eye tracking; Data quality; Reporting guidelines; Reporting standards; Reporting practices; Replicability; Reproducibility
Dokumenten­typ
Retraction
CC Lizenz
CC-BY
Open Access Type
Hybrid
ISSN/eISSN
1554-351X - 1554-3528
DOI
Öffnen URL 10.3758/s13428-021-01762-8
WoS ID
Öffnen URL WOS:000781225100001
PubMed ID
Öffnen URL MEDLINE:35384605

Weitere Details

Band
55
Startseite
364
Letzte Seite
416
Nummer
1
Seiten­anzahl
53
In this paper, we present a review of how the various aspects of any study using an eye tracker (such as the instrument, methodology, environment, participant, etc.) affect the quality of the recorded eye-tracking data and the obtained eye-movement and gaze measures. We take this review to represent the empirical foundation for reporting guidelines of any study involving an eye tracker. We compare this empirical foundation to five existing reporting guidelines and to a database of 207 published eye-tracking studies. We find that reporting guidelines vary substantially and do not match with actual reporting practices. We end by deriving a minimal, flexible reporting guideline based on empirical research (Section "empirically based minimal reporting guideline"). In this paper, we present a review of how the various aspects of any study using an eye tracker (such as the instrument, methodology, environment, participant, etc.) affect the quality of the recorded eye-tracking data and the obtained eye-movement and gaze measures. We take this review to represent the empirical foundation for reporting guidelines of any study involving an eye tracker. We compare this empirical foundation to five existing reporting guidelines and to a database of 207 published eye-tracking studies. We find that reporting guidelines vary substantially and do not match with actual reporting practices. We end by deriving a minimal, flexible reporting guideline based on empirical research (Section "An empirically based minimal reporting guideline").© 2022. The Author(s).

Download
 RDF/XML-Format
 JSON-LD-Format
 Turtle-Format
 N3-Format