Distribution and Persistence of Listeria monocytogenes in a Heavily Contaminated Poultry Processing Facility

Publikationen als Autor:in / Herausgeber:in der Vetmeduni

Wagner, Martin; Stessl, Beatrix

Abstrakt

We studied the colonization and distribution of Listeria monocytogenes in a heavily contaminated poultry processing plant over a 1-year period. A total of 180 nonfood contact surfaces, 70 food contact surfaces, 29 personnel, and 40 food samples were analyzed. L. monocytogenes isolates were subtyped by PCR serotyping, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and multilocus sequence typing. L. monocytogenes was detected in samples collected at every visit to the plant, and 43.8% (visit 4) to 65.6% (visit 7) of samples were positive, for an overall prevalence of 55.2%. The deboning area had the highest prevalence of positive samples (83.3%), and the processing area had the highest diversity of PFGE types. Ninety percent of the final products were positive for L. monocytogenes. Most of the isolates belonged to well-known persistent L. monocytogenes sequence types (ST9 and ST121). This study illustrates a well-established L. monocytogenes contamination problem in a poultry processing plant associated with a generalized failure of the food safety system as a whole. These findings reflect the potential for L. monocytogenes contamination when the food safety and quality management system is unsatisfactory, as described in the present study. It is essential to revise food safety and quality management systems to eliminate L. monocytogenes from food processing facilities, to control the entrance of sporadic sequence types, and to prevent L. monocytogenes spread within such facilities, especially in those premises with higher L. monocytogenes prevalence in the environment and final food products. HIGHLIGHTS Deboning and processing areas had the highest L. monocytogenes contamination. PFGE3/ST9 and PFGE7/ST121 were the most prevalent and persistent strains. Improving hygiene measures is essential for reducing the 100% prevalence in the final product.

Dokumententyp

Originalarbeit

DOI

10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-19-087

PubMed ID

MEDLINE:31414898